Vietnamese
中文 (中国)
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Intercom Polifemo
Based on the cost-benefit analysis of Intercom Polifemo, here’s a detailed comparison of three different gluing methods:
Comparison of Gluing Methods: Polifemo vs. Manual Spray vs. Hand Operation (Solvent Glue + Brush)
| Criteria | Polifemo | Manual Spray | Hand Operation (Brush & Solvent Glue) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gluing speed (mm/sec) | 250 | 75 | 15 |
| Gluing time required/day (min) | 540 | 1,050 | 2,400 |
| Manpower required (TM) | 2 | 4 | 18 |
| Annual manpower cost (US$) | 4,320 | 7,200 | 25,920 |
| Glue consumption per day (kg) | 9.9 | 23.4 | 115.2 |
| Annual glue cost (US$) | 18,563 | 43,875 | 86,400 |
| Total annual operating cost (US$) | 22,883 | 51,075 | 112,320 |
Cost-Benefit Analysis
-
Faster Gluing Speed
- Polifemo glues at 250 mm/sec, which is 3.3 times faster than manual spray (75 mm/sec) and 16.7 times faster than hand operation (15 mm/sec).
- This significantly reduces production time and increases efficiency.
-
Lower Labor Requirements
- Polifemo requires only 2 operators, while manual spray requires 4, and hand operation requires 18 workers.
- Annual labor cost for Polifemo is only 4,320 USD, 40% lower than manual spray (7,200 USD) and just 16% of the cost of hand operation (25,920 USD).
-
Lower Glue Consumption & Less Waste
- Polifemo consumes only 9.9 kg of glue per day, while manual spray requires 23.4 kg, and hand operation consumes 115.2 kg per day.
- Glue waste is only 10% for Polifemo, compared to 30% for manual spray and 60% for hand operation.
-
Lower Annual Glue Cost
- Polifemo’s annual glue cost is just 18,563 USD, which is 2.4 times lower than manual spray (43,875 USD) and 4.6 times lower than hand operation (86,400 USD).
-
Lowest Overall Operating Cost
- Polifemo’s total annual operating cost is 22,883 USD, which is 56% lower than manual spray (51,075 USD) and 79.6% lower than hand operation (112,320 USD).
Investment and Infrastructure Costs
| Category | Polifemo | Manual Spray | Hand Operation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Machines required (units) | 2 | 4 | 18 |
| Machine cost per unit (US$) | 75,000 | 15 | – |
| Total machine cost (US$) | 150,000 | 270 | – |
| Depreciation/year (US$) | 30,000 | 54 | – |
| Capital opportunity cost (10%) (US$) | 15,000 | 27 | – |
| Power consumption/year (KWh) | 8,100 | – | – |
| Annual power cost (US$) | 729 | – | – |
| Annual maintenance cost (3%) (US$) | 4,500 | 8 | – |
| Floor space used (m²) | 24 | 22 | – |
| Real estate cost (US$) | 120,000 | 110,000 | – |
| Total annual capital cost (US$) | 50,229 | 89 | – |
Key :
- Polifemo requires a higher initial investment (150,000 USD) but has significantly lower operating and maintenance costs.
- Manual spray has a lower investment cost but higher labor and glue costs, resulting in double the total operating expenses compared to Polifemo.
- Hand operation requires no machine investment but is highly labor-intensive and consumes excessive glue, making its total costs nearly 5 times higher than Polifemo.
Conclusion: Polifemo is the Most Cost-Effective Solution
- Highest production efficiency – 16 times faster than hand operation.
- Lowest labor costs – Only 2 workers needed instead of 18.
- Lowest glue consumption – Saving up to 4.6 times the glue cost.
- Lowest operating costs, making it the best long-term investment.
🎯 Polifemo is the optimal choice for businesses looking to cut costs, boost productivity, and improve product quality. 🚀
