
ROI Spraying full surface
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Intercom STEP
This analysis compares the STEP system, Manual Spray, and Hand Operation (Solvent Glue + Brush) for handbag production, evaluating their efficiency, costs, and overall economic benefits.
Comparison of Gluing Methods: STEP vs. Manual Spray vs. Hand Operation
Criteria | STEP | Manual Spray | Hand Operation (Brush & Solvent Glue) |
---|---|---|---|
Gluing speed (mm/sec) | 230 | 80 | 35 |
Gluing time required/day (min) | 365 | 1,050 | 2,400 |
Manpower required (TM) | 3 | 6 | 12 |
Annual manpower cost (US$) | 5,400 | 10,800 | 17,280 |
Total glue consumption/day (kg) | 6.34 | 9.36 | 46.08 |
Annual glue cost (US$) | 15,206 | 22,464 | 34,560 |
Total annual operating cost (US$) | 20,606 | 33,264 | 51,840 |
Cost-Benefit Analysis
1. Faster Gluing Speed & Increased Productivity
- STEP operates at 230 mm/sec, which is 2.9 times faster than Manual Spray (80 mm/sec) and 6.6 times faster than Hand Operation (35 mm/sec).
- This significantly reduces daily gluing time, allowing higher productivity and less labor dependency.
2. Lower Labor Requirements & Cost
- STEP requires only 3 workers, compared to 6 for Manual Spray and 12 for Hand Operation.
- Annual labor cost for STEP is only 5,400 USD, which is 50% lower than Manual Spray (10,800 USD) and nearly 3 times lower than Hand Operation (17,280 USD).
3. Lower Glue Consumption & Less Waste
- STEP consumes only 6.34 kg of glue per day, compared to 9.36 kg for Manual Spray and 46.08 kg for Hand Operation.
- Glue waste is only 10% for STEP, compared to 30% for Manual Spray and 60% for Hand Operation.
4. Lower Annual Glue Cost
- STEP’s annual glue cost is 15,206 USD, which is 32% lower than Manual Spray (22,464 USD) and 56% lower than Hand Operation (34,560 USD).
5. Lowest Overall Operating Cost
- STEP’s total annual operating cost is 20,606 USD, which is 38% lower than Manual Spray (33,264 USD) and 60% lower than Hand Operation (51,840 USD).
Investment & Infrastructure Costs
Category | STEP | Manual Spray | Hand Operation |
---|---|---|---|
Machines required (units) | 1 | 6 | 12 |
Machine cost per unit (US$) | 25,000 | 2,800 | 15 |
Total machine cost (US$) | 25,000 | 11,200 | 180 |
Depreciation/year (US$) | 5,000 | 1,000 | 36 |
Capital opportunity cost (10%) (US$) | 2,500 | – | 18 |
Power consumption/year (KWh) | 2,739 | – | – |
Annual power cost (US$) | 247 | – | – |
Annual maintenance cost (3%) (US$) | 750 | 150 | 5 |
Floor space used (m²) | 12 | 12 | 15 |
Real estate cost (US$) | 60,000 | – | 75,000 |
Total annual capital cost (US$) | 8,497 | – | 59 |
Key:
- STEP requires a higher initial investment (25,000 USD), but has significantly lower operating and maintenance costs.
- Manual Spray has lower investment costs, but higher labor and glue costs, leading to a total operating cost 1.6 times higher than STEP.
- Hand Operation requires no large machinery investment but has the highest labor and glue consumption, making its total costs 2.5 times higher than STEP.
Conclusion: STEP is the Most Cost-Efficient Choice
- Faster production output – 6.6 times faster than Hand Operation.
- Lowest labor costs – Only 3 workers needed instead of 12.
- Minimal glue consumption – Saving up to 56% in glue costs.
- Lowest overall operational expenses, making it the best long-term investment.
🎯 STEP is the ideal choice for companies aiming to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and enhance product quality. 🚀